MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1689591546 · doi:10.1139/v2012-006

Cathodoluminescence, X-ray excited optical luminescence, and X-ray absorption near-edge structure studies of ZnO nanostructures

2012· article· en· W1689591546 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Olga Lobacheva, Patricia L. Corcoran, Michael W. Murphy, Jun Young Peter Ko, Tsun‐Kong Sham

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCathodoluminescenceLuminescenceXANESExcited stateChemistryNanostructureSubstrate (aquarium)PhotoluminescenceAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption edgeOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyMaterials scienceBand gapAtomic physicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ZnO nanostructures of various morphologies and crystallinities were fabricated by thermal evaporation from Zn powder in a tube furnace in the presence of oxygen. It was found that the morphology of ZnO nanostructures was affected by synthesis parameters, such as growth temperature, carrier gas flow, and the presence of catalyst on the surface of the substrate. Representative ZnO nanostructures were studied by X-ray excited optical luminescence (XEOL) and cathodoluminescence (CL) methods. The luminescence from these samples exhibits a morphology dependence of the branching ratio of the near band gap (NBG) emission in the UV and defect emission in the green (GE). The appearance of the optical emission also depends on the excitation method. X-ray absorption near-edge structures (XANES) at the O K-edge and Zn L-edge are also presented and their implications discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207