Functional and Spatial System Model for City Infrastructure Systems: A City.Net <scp>IES</scp> Case Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT City infrastructure systems have distinct functions but are not isolated from one another, with interactions existing between these systems. Modeling these systems requires a focus on the system functions and interdependencies. Most models focus on system failures rather than the unexpected effects of design decisions in these systems. This paper presents a functional and spatial modeling framework suited for the representation of city infrastructure systems. This framework comprises a systematic process for breaking down the system into fundamental components and defining the relations between the system components. In addition, the spatial feature of the framework facilitates the synthesis, analysis, and evaluation of infrastructures based on their geographical locations and spatial orientations. This system modeling approach is used to design an Integrated Energy System ( IES ) model in order to exhibit the features of this framework. The IES consists of standard energy system estimation techniques and tools such as MATPOWER for load flow analysis, and is also used to execute a city case study. As a result, the advantages of the functional and spatial framework for modeling city infrastructures are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it