Iranian People and the Origin of the Turkish-speaking Population of the Northwestern of Iran
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The world is a place containing various racial and lingual groups. So that as far as this issue is concerned there is no difference between developed and developing countries. Iran is not an exception, because it can be called a multi-national or multi-racial community. The name of Azarbaijan has been one of the most renowned geographical names of Iran since 2000 years ago. Azar is the same as “Ashur” which means fire. In Pahlavi inscriptions, Azarbaijan has been mentioned as ‘Oturpatekan’, while it has been mentioned Azarbayegan and Azarpadegan in Persian writings. In this paper, attempt is made to study the race and people living there from the perspective of anthropology and ethnology. In fact, it is based on this question that whether or not, the people resided in Atropatgan have an Aryan race as other Iranians? According to anthropological and ethnical criteria of people in Atropatgan, we came to this conclusion that they have the same race (i.e. Aryan) similar as other Iranians who are the reminders and grandchildren of Aryan and Parse Medes. Therefore, the opposite is completely rejected on the view of the racial characteristics and all documents accounts for their Aryan race. Key words : Iranian people; Atropatgan; Azaris; Anthropology; Genetic origin Resume Le monde est un endroit contenant divers groupes raciaux et linguales. Alors que dans la mesure ou cette question est concerne il n’ya aucune difference entre les pays developpes et en developpement. L’Iran n’est pas une exception, car il peut etre appele une communaute multinational ou multi-raciale. Le nom de Azerbaidjan a ete l’un des plus grands noms geographiques de l’Iran depuis 2000 ans. Azar est le meme que “Ashur”, qui signifi e feu. En Pahlavi inscriptions, Azerbaidjan a ete mentionnee comme «Oturpatekan’, alors qu’il a ete mentionne Azarbayegan et Azarpadegan dans les ecrits persans. Dans cet article, la tentative est faite pour etudier la course et les gens qui y vivent dans la perspective de l’anthropologie et l’ethnologie. En fait, il est base sur cette question que si oui ou non, les gens ont reside dans Atropatgan une race aryenne comme les autres Iraniens? Selon les criteres anthropologiques et ethniques de personnes dans Atropatgan, nous sommes arrives a cette conclusion qu’ils ont la meme race (c.-a-aryenne) similaire a celle d’autres Iraniens qui sont les rappels et les petitsenfants de aryenne et Parse Medes. Par consequent, le contraire est completement rejete sur le point de vue des caracteristiques raciales et tous les comptes des documents pour leur race aryenne. Mots cles : Peuple iranien; Atropatgan; Les Azeris; Anthropologie; Origine genetique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".