Patient Focused Care: Theory and Practice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Therapeutic recreation is often conceptualized as inherently person-centered. However, there have been virtually no examples of what person focused TR practice actually looks like. The present study attempted to fill this gap. The study was carried out in response to the desire of therapeutic recreationists at a major Canadian health care facility to better understand thenpractice. Of particular interest was the initial encounter between patient and therapist, an encounter that traditionally has been called assessment. As a part of this action research project, the co-researcher/practitioners engaged in a reflective process that allowed them gain a deeper understanding of themselves and their practice. This they did by looking beyond therapeutic recreation to another discipline, nursing, where they found Parse's theory of human becoming. The findings of this study demonstrate an approach that fosters the emergence of more authentic relationships between patients and therapists, and enables therapeutic recreation to more nearly fulfil its potential in the practice of patient focused care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it