MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Woman as a Wonder as a Monster: on Mathilde The Woman Who Loses A Sex War

2009· article· en· W1693127069 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huiqing Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDreamFemininityTranscendence (philosophy)FantasyArtMonsterHumanitiesMasculinityId, ego and super-egoPsychoanalysisWonderPhilosophyLiteratureSubjectivityPsychologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Stendhal’s The Red and the Black, the second leading female character Mathilde appears a quite “monstrous” young woman yet with fascination. She is neither mystery nor enigma but simply of a psychological sex a “man+woman woman” in my concept, a dilemma typical of Her as Other as an Object meanwhile so self-consciously struggling for subjectivity, for transcendence. Noble, proud, passionate, a little hysteric, obsessed with fantasy. There buried, repressed deep, and, “hidden skilfully” in her is the “120% of ‘masculinity’ in her femininity”. She takes efforts to behave like a woman, yet she seeks to realize her transcendence in the man she loves. Though the man, Julien, shares with her the same wild imagination and ambition, though they both are addicted to dream of heroism, he finally comes to the point of not loving her any more, for he gets tired of heroism. Mathilde loses in the war, for she fights, but fights in order to realize her heroism in love, in her lover, a man. Key words: psychological sex; sex war; French Feminism; transcendence; rival Resume: Dans Le Rouge et le Noir de Stendhal, le deuxieme personnage feminin Mathilde semble plutot une monstrueuse jeune femme avec fascination. Dans mon concept, elle n'est ni mystere ni enigme, mais simplement d'un sexe psychologique homme + femme un dilemme typique d’Elle et d’Autre comme un Objet, et en meme temps elle lutte avec une auto-conscience pour la subjectivite et la transcendance. Noble, fiere, passionnee, un peu hysterique, obsedee par la fantaisie. Il y est enterree, refloulee profondement et dissimulee habilement en elle une 120% de masculinite dans sa de feminite. Elle prend des efforts pour se comporter comme une femme, mais elle cherche a realiser sa transcendance a l'homme qu'elle aime. Bien que cet homme, Julien, partage avec elle la meme imagination sauvage et l'ambition, et qu’ils soient adonnes au reve de l'heroisme, il finit enfin par ne plus l’aimer, car il se fatigue de l'heroisme. Mathilde perd la guerre. Elle se bat, mais elle se bat pour realiser son l'heroisme dans l'amour, chez son amant, un homme. Mots-Cles: sexe psychologique; la guerre de sexe; le feminisme francais; transcendence; rival

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicFrench Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207