TRANSNATIONAL TELEVISION HISTORY: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Andreas Fickers and Catherine Johnson Section 1: Retracing paths and places of transnational circulation 1. Transnationality in Dutch (Pre) Television: The central role of Erik de Vries Sonja de Leeuw 2. The 'North Atlantic Triangle': Britain, the USA and Canada in 1950s television Michele Hilmes 3. Transatlantic Spaces: Production, location and style in 1960s-1970s action-adventure TV series Jonathan Bignell 4. Creating Transnationality Through an International Organization?: The European Broadcasting Union's (EBU) television programme activities Christian Henrich-Franke 5. European Crimeatches: A comparative perspective on Aktenzeichen XY's transnational circulation Eggo Muller 6. Eventing Europe: The transnational emergence of a European television landscape in the 1950s Andreas Fickers 7. Re-placed Communities: Crossover as a transnational practice of television in Cold War Eastern Europe Dana Mustata 8.Video Active and the challenges of developing online access to compare European television programmes from the archive Rob Turnock Section 2: Localizing the Transnational in Regional Television History 9. Perspectives on Localizing the Transnational in Regional Television History / Introduction Catherine Johnson and Andreas Fickers 10. France 3, a state institution: the French model of regional television Benoit Lafon 11. Regional television in Germany Edgar Lersch 12. Regional television in Spain: the Andalusian case Juan Francisco Gutierrez Lozano 13. From multicultural programming to diasporic television: situating the UK in a European context Sarita Malik
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it