MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W169617824

Un futuro para los gitanos de Hungría

2002· article· es· W169617824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Ország‐Land

Bibliographic record

VenueI Tchatchipen: lil ada trin tchona rodipen romani = revista trimestral de investigación gitana · 2002
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Immigration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceEuropean unionArtBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El autor nos presenta a Zsolt Janos, un joven roma que ha acabado los estudios secundarios y que se ha graduado en la Escuela Hungara de Secundaria �Gandhi�, una institucion creada para formar una elite gitana. A traves de la situacion particular de este joven, con nombre falso, el lector puede entrar en la situacion de los gitanos en Hungria. En este pais del Este europeo, solo un 0,3% de los gitanos obtiene el certificado de educacion secundaria y solo un 25% acaba los estudios primarios. La Comision Europea pide a varios estados del Este de Europa que persigan la discriminacion, aunque el hecho de su existencia, acompanada de un racismo abiertamente mostrado por la mayoria de la poblacion, no impide la entrada a la Union Europea de estos estados. Muchos gitanos tratan de solucionar ellos mismos sus problemas. Otros emigran hacia paises del Oeste europeo, Estados Unidos o Canada. Pero el Consejo Nacional Gitano de Hungria no aprueba la salida del pais de la gran minoria etnica. Este organismo confia en resolver la �cuestion gitana� a traves de una legislacion que ayude a la reforma social ademas de otros proyectos que dibuja el autor en su articulo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueI Tchatchipen: lil ada trin tchona rodipen romani = revista trimestral de investigación gitanaSame topicHuman Rights and ImmigrationFrench-language works237,207