MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1697206102 · doi:10.1109/dmca.1997.603553

Sensor development in oil sand processing

2002· article· en· W1697206102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsProcess (computing)Process controlExtraction (chemistry)Petroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceTrack (disk drive)Process engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extraction of oil from Alberta's Athabasca Oil Sand deposit is of great economic significance to Alberta and Canada. With the extremely large amount of material processed in an oil sand extraction operation, there are substantial gains to be made through small improvements in processing efficiencies. Understanding the process sufficiently well enough to employ model-based control is very difficult, not only because of the constantly changing nature of the oil sand entering the plant, but also because of the lack of available measurement systems which can reliably track the process. At Syncrude Canada Ltd., sensor development plays an important role in attempts to improve the process. This paper will discuss some of the problems faced by developers and describe three sensing applications currently under development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it