Regards sur le Rêve-Éveillé et l'Imaginaire dans la littérature américaine spécialisée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur examine la littérature américaine spécialisée et y recherche les méthodes psychothérapiques qui pourraient être proches du Rêve-Éveillé. Pour que le Rêve-Éveillé soit mieux repéré (et mieux connu) dans son pays (USA et Canada), il conclut sur la nécessité de discuter de manière approfondie le concept de l’imaginaire. Tom Holman – Sguardi sul rêve-éveillé e l’Immaginario nella letteratura americana specializzatta Riassunto: L’autore esamina la letteratura americana specializzata e vi cerca metodi psicoterapici che potrebbero avvicinarsi al Rêve-Éveillé. Perché il Rêve-Éveillé sia meglio individuato (e meglio conosciuto) nel suo paese (Stati Uniti e Canada) egli conclude sulla necessità di discutere in maniera approfondita il concetto dell’immaginario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".