O Imaginário da Passagem: imagens e símbolos no encontro com adolescentes em privação de liberdade na Fundação CASA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation refers to the research conducted in Osasco CASA I, one of the inmate units of CASA Foundation -former FEBEM-SP -where teenagers, deprived of liberty, comply social & educational measures.As a research methodology, creation workshops were weekly conducted between October 2008 and January 2010.Those workshops didn't have a programmed format nor they targeted a specific product, enabling the researcher and the adolescents to build, throughout the research period, a meeting point, which was set up not only as a locus of observation, but also as a place of image creation and engagement.The duration of the field trips has also allowed the monitoring of the entire stay of some adolescents: from their arrival to the return to "mundão" (a slang for the outside world).The research seeks to penetrate in the imaginary and symbolic dimensions of the liberty deprivation, as well as in the images that constellate the symbolism of passage, from the narratives that the meeting produced.The workshops produced another important material for analysis, the workshop journals, which outlined a gamut of conflicts around the experience of liberty deprivation.Four journals had been selected and further connected to the material elements -earth, water, fire and air, for presenting different imaginary configurations, according to the adherence of the imagination to the material elements.The image readings arisen during the workshops, as seen on the journals, were inspired by Gaston Bachelard's phenomenology of the poetic imagination, taking in consideration the notions of material imagination and dynamic imagination that sustain it.Finally, a symbolic reading of the "passages" taken by two teenagers and an educator from CASA Osasco has been performed, based on Gilbert Durand's theory on the imaginary, with the theoric aid from Junito Brandão and Erich Neumann.Connecting those three "passengers" and a few mythical figures, the analysis endeavors to observe how the narrators update these myths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".