MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Minor Elements Utility in Paleo-lake Evolvement and Signification of Lower Tertiary Fning Formation,Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

2009· article· en· W1699364142 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qiang Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary rockDiagenesisStructural basinPaleontologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the study vertical variations of trace elements: Boron(B) and Strontium(Sr) contents testing in clay rock of tertiary Funing Formation(from bottom to up :E1f1、 E1f2、 E1f3、 E1f4), Gaoyou sag, Subei Basin of China., the water of palaeolake in Gaoyou sag of Subei Basin changed from freshwater(E1f1、E1f3) gradually to salt water(E1f2、E1f4). The calcareous cement is formed in early diagenesis. It also means that Gaoyou palaeolake was twice opened to the sea from the first section of Fning Formation to the fourth (E1f1-E1f4). During the second and fourth of Funing Formation (E1f2、E1f4), the Gaoyou palaeolake was the deepest and the area was largest. Comprehensive analysis of trace elements indicates that palaeo-salinity and depth fluctuated during different sedimentary periods. The sedimentary periods of Funing Formation can be divided into 9 intermediate cycles with relative lake level change. The paleolake level was relative rising quickly in the second and fourth of Funing Formation (E1f4) and relative descending quickly in the first Funing Formation (E1f1). Key words: palaeolake; trace elements; lower tertiary Fning Formation; Gaoyou sag

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.008
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciencesSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207