Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article examine sous l’angle de l’interculturalité le renouvellement cinématographique du road movie au tournant du xxi e siècle. La cohérence que le terme et l’idée de culture confèrent à une reconfiguration de ce genre filmique réside dans les tensions dont se saisissent des films contemporains faisant appel à l’imaginaire de la route pour mettre en rapport enjeux identitaires et appartenance culturelle. L’interculturalité ne se résume donc pas à une simple unité thématique qui reprendrait en écho le discours aujourd’hui dominant du contact et de la diversité culturels. S’appuyant sur une filmographie pour l’essentiel sud-américaine, nord-américaine et européenne, l’étude privilégie trois axes de réflexion, qui isolent chacun une acception distincte du concept de culture et, partant, délimitent une dimension particulière de l’interculturel. Disponibilisation contrariée, asymétrie et opacité relaient ainsi une analyse situant la dimension interculturelle du road movie contemporain au-delà d’une simple interculturalité de figuration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".