MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1701687776 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2013-0094

Three-dimensional behaviour of a prototype radioactive waste repository in fractured granitic rock

2013· article· en· W1701687776 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hywel Rhys Thomas, Philip J. Vardon, Peter John Cleall

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsRadioactive wasteHydraulic conductivityAnisotropyGeotechnical engineeringTransient (computer programming)Thermal hydraulicsBentoniteUnderground storageRange (aeronautics)Thermal conductivityFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceGeologyMechanicsEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceSoil scienceHeat transferEngineeringWaste managementComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An investigation of the three-dimensional coupled thermohydromechanical behaviour of a prototype repository in fractured granitic rock is presented. The pre-placement behaviour of the repository is first considered, making use of a full three-dimensional simulation of the problem. An effective continuum approach, augmented with discrete features with a high hydraulic conductivity, is employed. The method adopted is found to be able to simulate accurately the highly anisotropic flow regime observed at the pre-placement phase. The major features of the full repository experiment under applied heating conditions were then successfully simulated. The range of buffer hydration rates, the thermal response of the repository, and the associated mechanical response were successfully simulated. Approaches to capture both the transient microstructural behaviour of the compacted bentonite (MX-80 type) and a MX-80 pellet material are incorporated. The repository behaviour was shown to be strongly influenced by complex coupled processes, including interactions between the system components. The adoption of a three-dimensional modelling approach proved to be essential to realistically simulate the behaviour of a repository incorporating anisotropic flow behaviour. Finally, potential impacts of the processes considered on performance of the barrier system and in safety assessment are considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207