Hydrogen elimination from the dissociation of methyl-substituted silanes on tungsten and tantalum surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The elimination of H2 from the dissociation of four methyl-substituted silane molecules, including monomethylsilane (MMS), dimethylsilane (DMS), trimethylsilane (TriMS), and tetramethylsilane (TMS), on a heated tungsten or tantalum filament surface has been studied using laser ionization mass spectrometry. Two complementary ionization methods, i.e., single photon ionization (SPI) using a vacuum ultraviolet wavelength at 118 nm (10.5 eV) and a dual ionization source incorporating both 10.5 eV SPI and laser-induced electron ionization, were employed to detect the production of H2. Examination of the intensity of the H2+ peak from the four molecules has shown that it increases with temperature until reaching a plateau at around 2000−2100 °C on both tungsten and tantalum filaments. These methyl-substituted silanes are dissociatively adsorbed on tungsten and tantalum surfaces by Si−H bond cleavage, and as the temperature is raised, by C−H bond rupture. Experiments with the isotopomers of MMS, DMS, and TriMS have shown that the formation of H2 follows the Langmuir−Hinshelwood mechanism where two adsorbed hydrogen atoms on metal surfaces recombine to produce H2. The determined activation energy (Ea) for H2 formation from MMS, DMS, and TriMS, in the range of 58.2−93.4 kJ mol−1, has been found to increase with the number of methyl substitutions in the precursor molecule. Comparison of these Ea values with the reported values of 51.1−78.8 kJ mol−1 for the methyl radical formation from the same three precursor molecules has led to the conclusion that the initial Si−H bond cleavage in the dissociative adsorption of MMS, DMS, and TriMS is the rate-limiting step for the formation of both H2 molecules and ·CH3 radicals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".