Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le droit d'association constitue l'un des droits fondamentaux des fideles dans l'Eglise. Dans le present article, l'A. presente la dynamique propre a l'Eglise et au monde du debut du troisieme millenaire et ses incidences sur l'exercice du droit d'association. Les facteurs pertinents qui permettent de comprendre la facon dont s'exprime ce droit sont: la notion de communia, la nouvelle evangelisation, la diversite du monde et des cultures humaines, ainsi que diverses caracteristiques propres aux hommes et aux femmes d'aujourd'hui, la place de la religion dans les societes modernes et l'evolution du concept de Dieu. Apres avoir analyse ces facteurs et l'influence qu'ils exercent sur l'expression de la religiosite de notre epoque, l'A. suggere que le concept canonique d'association religieuse pourrait permettre d'elaborer une formule de rechange au modele de la paroisse, etant donne qu'il permet d'amenager un lieu regulier, voire exclusif, d'expression religieuse, et ce surtout dans la perspective du desenchantement face a la paroisse qu'eprouvent les fideles de certaines generations. L'Auteur termine en formulant quelques considerations elementaires sur la facon dont il faut s'y prendre pour mettre sur pied des associations de ce genre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".