Chile 1973: Memoria, trauma y búsqueda en la narrativa chileno canadiense actual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las tres obras narrativas analizadas aquí (Crimen sin castigo by Juan Carlos García, Retribution by Carmen Rodríguez, and Some thing Fierceby Carmen Aguirre) cuentan con el Golpe de Chile de 1973 como telón de fondo. Los autores emplean diferentes enfoques para conformar su mundo narrativo, produciendo obras muy diferentes entre sí. Carmen Rodríguez termina escribiendo una novela, en tanto que Carmen Aguirre escribe unas memorias mientras Juan Carlos García crea una obra que oscila entre el testimonio y la novela testimonial. Aunque los diferentes enfoques determinan resultados diferentes, los tres autores tratan del trauma ocasionado por las torturas que los protagonistas de las historias padecen, tratan también de encontrar una respuesta a por qué se dio el Golpe de Pinochet, así como de dar un testimonio de los abusos sufridos, de los sacrificios hechos por las víctimas, de la búsqueda de sentido en sus vidas después de vivir la represión y de la necesidad de llevar a la justicia a los perpetradores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".