L’être-soi et l’être-seul. Le problème de la solitude dans la phénoménologie de Michel Henry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plus qu’aucune autre dans la tradition phénoménologique, la pensée de Michel Henry semble prêter le flanc à l’objection de solipsisme : non seulement en raison de son traitement en apparence tardif du problème de l’expérience d’autrui, mais aussi en ceci que, positivement cette fois, L’essence de la manifestation fait explicitement de la « solitude » l’un des traits fondamentaux de l’être de l’ego. À rebours d’une telle interprétation, et prenant appui sur un ensemble de notes de jeunesse parfois inédites, cette étude se propose au contraire de montrer qu’une telle « solitude », parce qu’elle permet de conférer à l’idée même de « subjectivité » une signification tout à fait nouvelle et originale, constitue aux yeux de M. Henry le seul lieu possible d’un authentique rapport à l’autre — pour autant qu’il est un Soi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".