MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural Analysis of Social Capital: Institution, Relations, and Order

2010· article· en· W1704667481 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zheng-dong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Capital and Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial capitalInstitutionSocial orderSocial mobilitySocial reproductionSociologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceSocial scienceLawPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current studies on social capital are both broad and in-depth in terms of contents and forms as well. The structure among various forms, however, seems to be a sort of in disorder, without establishing a institution with a relatively clear dividing line. This paper believes that social capital doesn’t include microscopic forms of trust, norm, and network, etc only. We, through in-depth studies from macro-structure aspect, could discover that social capital in fact exists in three broader fields of social institution, social relations, and social order. Social institution, social relations, and social order are essentially the initial state of social capital. Every specific form of social capital is unexceptionally the result of interrelation and interaction among these three. Every single form of social capital doesn’t purely belong to a certain field; it closely relates to other fields instead. And it even is the combination of multiple-form social capital. Both structural and resource natures of social capital thread together instead of being discrete. Keywords: social capital; social institution; social relations; and social orderResume: Les etudes actuelles sur le capital social sont a la fois larges et profondes en termes de contenu et des formes. La structure des formes diverses, cependant, semble etre une sorte de desordre, sans une ligne de demarcation relativement claire. Ce document estime que le capital social n'inclut pas de formes microscopiques de confiance, ni de normes, ni de reseaux. A travers des etudes en profondeur a partir des aspects macro-structurels, nous avons pu decouvrir que le capital social existe en fait dans trois domaines plus larges, c'est-a-dire l'institution sociale, les relations sociales et l'ordre social. L'institution sociale, les relations sociales et l'ordre social sont essentiellement l'etat initial du capital social. Chaque forme specifique de capital social est sans exception le resultat de l'inter-relation et l'interaction entre ces trois. Toute forme unique du capital social n'appartient pas purement a un certain domaine, par contre, elle est etroitement liee a d'autres domaines. Et elle peut meme etre la combinaison de multiples formes de capital social. Au lieu d'etre isolees, la nature structurelle et les ressources du capital social sont liees.Mots-cles: capital social, institution sociale, relations sociales, ordre social

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicSocial Capital and NetworksFrench-language works237,207