La construction sociale des relations entre éducation et économie : Les cas des formations en alternance en Wallonie et au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans nombre de pays industrialises, le entre l'univers economique et le monde de l'education est inscrit de diverses manieres a l'agenda socio-politique. Le present ouvrage vise a comprendre ce processus par l'analyse d'une de ces formes, la formation en alternance entre ecole et entreprise. L'analyse compare les politiques menees au plan institutionnel au Quebec et dans la Communaute Wallonie-Bruxelles mais surtout elle examine la mise en œuvre locale en s'appuyant sur quatre etudes de cas dans les secteurs de la bureautique et de l'electronique. Le rapprochement education/economie n'apparait pas comme une fatalite structurelle imputable seulement aux evolutions economiques ou aux problemes de l'ecole face aux jeunes refractaires a la norme scolaire. Le developpement de l'alternance est le resultat d'un travail de transaction et d'ajustement entre acteurs de l'ecole et de l'entreprise sur le plan des valeurs et du sens comme des formes organisationnelles. Ce travail produit des modes d'echange contrastes non seulement entre le Quebec et la Wallonie, mais aussi entre chaque experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".