Spatial‐scale partitioning of in situ turbulent flow data over a pebble cluster in a gravel‐bed river
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spatial structures within turbulent flow data were investigated through the use of a new multivariate variation partitioning analysis technique involving principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM), which is a form of distance‐based eigenvector maps (DBEM). The analysis revealed a significant (α = 0.01) spatial dependence, 58%, for the mean and turbulent flow variables. The flow variables were obtained from instantaneous two‐dimensional velocities collected in situ along a streamwise section that crosses over a pebble cluster in a gravel‐bed river. Using the orthogonal property of the PCNM variables, the explained variation was partitioned over four significant (α = 0.01) spatial scales: very large (VL, 17%), large (L, 24%), medium (M, 6%) and fine (F, 2%). Nearly 75% of the variance of the main turbulent flow indicators, such as the root‐mean‐square of the streamwise and vertical velocity components and the mean uv component Reynolds shear stress, was explained by the VL‐ and L‐scale PCNM submodels, which have streamwise and vertical length scales of the order of Δx = 5.3H − 2.6H and Δy = 1.0H − 0.5H (where H is the flow depth), respectively. Through a multivariate mapping procedure, clear spatial patterns within the explained flow variables emerge around the cluster, where the flow separation zone seems to play a significant role at a range of scales. As well, intervariable correlations at each spatial scale, obtained through eigenvector scatterplots, show intricate relationships between the flow variables. The interdependence of the Reynolds shear stress and the u component turbulent energy is much stronger at the VL scale than at the L and M scales. The application of PCNM analysis on the turbulent flow field shows the power of the technique to resolve the relevant spatial scales and patterns, and demonstrates its potential use in a variety of water resources studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".