MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W170563316 · doi:10.26504/rs34

Governance and Funding of Voluntary Secondary Schools in Ireland

2013· report· en· W170563316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEconomic and Social Research Institute
KeywordsCorporate governancePolitical scienceTurnoverPublic relationsPublic administrationManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a comprehensive picture of educational governance and financing among second-level schools in Ireland.There are three second-level sectors in Ireland, 1 which have their origins in historical developments and policy changes: voluntary secondary schools, vocational schools (including community colleges), and community/comprehensive schools (see Chapter 3).Broadly interpreted, governance refers to the ownership, organisation and management of schools.The mode of governance varies across different types of schools, with voluntary secondary schools increasingly being governed by lay School Trusts; community/comprehensive schools under the joint trusteeship of religious orders and the state while vocational schools (including community colleges) are under the trusteeship of the state.The way in which the different school types are financed and the extent to which the state supports the trusteeship function across the three second-level sectors also varies, as shown in this report.While all sectors have undergone significant changes since the conception of the education system, these changes have been particularly pronounced in denominational 2 voluntary secondary schools, the prime focus of this study.Denominational schools have been an important part of the educational landscape in Ireland and currently make up just over half of all second-level schools catering for almost 60 per cent of all second-level student intake.Recent years have seen a decline in the number of religious personnel, resulting in less direct involvement of religious orders in school governance and the emergence of new structures in the form of lay Education Trust Companies (see Chapter 4) responsible for the education enterprise and properties.In tandem with this development, members of religious orders who previously provided Trustee services on a voluntary (unpaid) basis have been replaced by paid personnel funded by Congregations or independent Trust Companies.In the context of constrained educational expenditure in general, these developments have raised concerns about the sustainability of the voluntary secondary sector (McGrath, 2006; Reynolds, 2005).1 While there are more accurately four types of second-level education provision, for the purposes of this report vocational schools and community colleges are treated as one sector, governed by the VECs/ETBs. 2A wide variety of terms are used in the literature, including 'faith schools' and 'religious schools'.Here, to reflect ordinary usage in Ireland, the term 'denominational school' is used to refer to a voluntary secondary school under the trusteeship of a religious order, diocese or lay trust. viii | Go vernan ce and Fundin g o f Volu ntary S econdary Schoo ls in Irelan dThis study seeks to provide new evidence to inform the debate on school governance and funding.It draws on in-depth interviews with key stakeholders in Ireland, including the representatives of Education Trust Companies, vocational and community/comprehensive school sectors as well as the Department of Education and Skills and religious organisations; administrative data, and a largescale representative survey of second-level chairpersons of school boards of management and school principals.The analysis of data on the Irish context is contextualised with an analysis of school and funding structures in four international case-study jurisdictions. THE INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVEDebate about the future of denominational schools is not confined to the Irish context.An analysis of the models of governance of schools and funding of trusteeship in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Australia and Canada (Ontario) was conducted based on existing research and policy documentation as well as direct communication with relevant stakeholders in these jurisdictions.School structures are found to be firmly embedded in national (or regional) political, cultural and social contexts, thus constraining the possibility of directly 'transplanting' one model from one context to another.However, insights from other systems can contribute to 'policy learning' (Raffe, 2011), allowing us to reflect on what can be gleaned from international models through the lens of the Irish experience.Our analysis indicated that the countries studied had adopted different approaches to the governance, ownership and funding of denominational schools that can be broadly characterised as distinct models or typologies:1.The hand-over of school ownership to the state, which fully funds their entire costs, along with legal provision to maintain their denominational ethos (Scotland, Northern Ireland);2. The maintenance of school autonomy (including covering the development of the characteristic spirit or ethos), while receiving 90 per cent of their funding from the state and 10 per cent from the Church (England and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207