Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lecture et compréhension de l’actuel traitement des Rroms de France gagnent significativement en clarté en mobilisant les travaux de Michel Foucault portant sur la relation entre pouvoir et résistance, traversée par la notion de biopolitique qu’il a développée. Dans une perspective foucaldienne, si le seul déchiffrement des relations de pouvoir engageant les populations Rroms ne suffit pas, il prend alors tout son sens en contribuant à l’élaboration de processus de résistances. Mais résister contre quoi ? Comment et pourquoi ? Cet article propose d’examiner, à travers l’actualité biopolitique, comment peuvent se penser et s’opérer des formes de résistances collectives des populations rroms de France. Il s’agit alors pour nous de voir comment ces dernières peuvent ainsi initier des processus de désassujettissement, en se constituant sujets réactifs et inventifs, opposant à un pouvoir-savoir dominant qui les marginalise des formes alternatives de subjectivation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".