MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1706957764 · doi:10.7202/1012980ar

Les populations hospitalisées à l’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec et à l’Hôtel-Dieu Saint-Vallier de Chicoutimi de 1881 à 1942

2012· article· fr· W1706957764 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
François Guérard

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une transition fondamentale a lieu dans les hôpitaux à partir des dernières décennies duxixe siècle, alors que leur fréquentation s’élargit des groupes les plus pauvres de la société à l’ensemble de celle-ci. Effectuée à la faveur de la commercialisation et de la médicalisation des services offerts, cette transition est fort mal connue en ce qui a trait à l’évolution de la composition des populations hospitalisées. À l’aide d’une double étude de cas fondée sur les registres d’entrée et de sortie des patients, le présent article vise à préciser cette composition dans les années précédant la transition jusqu’à la Seconde Guerre mondiale, en termes d’âge, de genre, de provenances géographiques et de catégories socioprofessionnelles. Il en ressort, parmi divers constats, des bassins de recrutement étonnamment vastes, de nettes distinctions sociales quant à l’accès aux chambres privées et aux salles communes, des écarts parfois majeurs entre groupes d’âge et entre sexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207