Relaxin Family Genes in Humans and Teleosts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Functions of the relaxin peptide family have been primarily investigated in mammals, and little attention has been paid to nonmammalian species. In this work, we performed phylogenetic and syntenic data analyses to identify the number and orthologous and paralogous relationships of relaxin family genes in teleosts and humans. Additionally, we performed reverse transcription PCR to determine the expression of three members of the relaxin family in zebrafish brain and gonads. We found evidence that teleosts harbor orthologs of the human INSL5, H2, H3, and INSL3 genes, so-named RLND/RLNE, RLNC, RLN3a/RLN3b, and RLNF in teleosts, respectively. Moreover, the presence of mRNA for RLN3a, RLND, and RLNF in both male and female brain and gonads of zebrafish suggests that all three genes are expressed in these tissues of this teleost. Differential expression and/or regulation of these genes will be explored in future experimental work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".