MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1708313646

Associations spironolactone IEC ou ARA II : un risque élevé d'hyperkaliémie

2006· article· fr· W1708313646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michel Gerson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPotassium and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpironolactoneGynecologyMedicineMedical prescriptionInternal medicineHeart failurePharmacology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'essai RALES [1] avait montre que la spironolactone reduisait la morbidite et la mortalite chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque severe, au prix de rares hyperkaliemies (2 % des patients du groupe traite). Dans l'€tat de l'Ontario (Canada), un suivi informatise des prescriptions medicamenteuses est assure pour les residents de plus de 65 ans (1,3 millions de personnes). Les prescriptions de spironolactone, inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion (IEC), sartans, betabloquants, [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPotassium and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207