Road movie et construction d’un discours interculturel dans The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’émiettement du corps social et la constitution d’un espace et d’un temps des tribus (Maffesoli 2000) sont les signes d’une décomposition et d’une recomposition des univers culturels ainsi que des rapports que ceux-ci entretiennent entre eux. The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994) de Stephan Elliott peut se lire comme une mise en scène de ce dynamisme social par la convocation d’une culture de la périphérie, la culture gay, dans le canevas d’un genre typé : le road movie. Cet article tente la lecture de la problématique culturelle par le prisme technique du road movie et de ses aménagements esthétiques et sociaux. En effet, dans ce film, la culture homosexuelle est livrée on the road, mais aussi dans ses rapports à la société. Si le road movie permet une allégorisation du parcours, il met surtout en évidence les rapports interculturels, dont les manifestations se placent sous le sceau du conflit mais aussi sous celui d’une complémentarité dont il faut analyser les modalités et les performances pour comprendre qu’en définitive, questionner cette (inter)culture révèle combien la culture est de nature sédimentaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".