Impact de la formation en français sur objectifs spécifiques sur la compétence discursive de l’apprenant scientifique marocain : cas de l’Ecole Nationale d’Agriculture de Meknès
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La méthodologie adoptée repose sur trois outils d’investigation à savoir, le questionnaire, l’analyse de contenu du compte rendu d’un article de vulgarisation scientifique choisi comme support de travail, et l’analyse de contenu du tableau récapitulatif du même texte-support. 
 Nos instruments d’investigation ont permis de déceler une amélioration des acquis intégrés, mais celle-ci ne touche pas toutes les habiletés. L’étude a démontré notamment que nos options méthodologiques se sont révélées insuffisantes, car la finalité ne saurait se réduire à l’acquisition de compétences méthodologiques ou de savoir-faire, mais doit viser également la maîtrise du système proprement linguistique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".