MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W17093591

経尿道的手術直後に膀胱内注入されたピラルビシン(THP)の血漿および血球への移行

2001· article· en· W17093591 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
知靖 津島, 保友 那須, 隆史 雑賀, 良治 新, 義範 白崎, 信行 日下, 裕巳 公文, 英昭 橋本, 修 森永, 和史 石井, 豊子 大和, 偵也 上原, 輝明 赤枝

Bibliographic record

Venue日本泌尿器科學會雜誌 · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health and Social Inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the ways of finding out where we are going consists of asking ourselves where do we come from. Here the author uses a historical approach to give an overview of the problem of insanity in Québec. The author discusses how people view insanity, its causes and treatments and the characteristics of the organizations (actors, values, knowledge, human and financial resources) that have met its challenge. The author describes two periods: the period of bureaucratic rationalization (the Bédard and Castonguay-Nepveu reports) and the period of community responsibility. Rather than presenting anecdotes, the author concentrates on raising a number of questions that can help unravel the debate on forming a policy on mental health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue日本泌尿器科學會雜誌Same topicPublic Health and Social InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207