MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1709676693

Non-linear normalized entropy based exposure blending

2013· article· en· W1709676693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGraphics Interface · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTone mappingNormalization (sociology)Dynamic rangeClassification of discontinuitiesEntropy (arrow of time)High dynamic rangeHigh-dynamic-range imagingComputer scienceDynamic range compressionLinearityRadiometryArtificial intelligenceComputer visionIrradianceAlgorithmMathematicsOpticsPhysicsEngineeringElectronic engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider the problem of dynamic range compression from multiple exposures in the absence of raw images, radiometric response functions, or irradiance information. This is achieved in a rapid and relatively simplistic fashion by merging image content across provided exposures. The premise of the proposal lies in assuming as one important goal of tone-mapping, that of making visible any contrast appearing across a dynamic range that exceeds display capabilities, while preserving the nature of the image structure, lighting, and avoiding introducing discontinuities in illumination, or image artifacts. The strategy assumed for this purpose appeals to the local entropy evident in each exposure, and employs cross-exposure normalization of entropy with a non-linearity characterized by a single parameter providing a trade-off between detail, and smoothness of the result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it