MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1712136271 · doi:10.1002/047147844x.wl26

<scp>G</scp> reat <scp>L</scp> akes <scp>G</scp> overnors' <scp>A</scp> greement

2004· other· en· W1712136271 on OpenAlexaffabout
Frédèric Lasserre

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Encyclopedia · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionAgency (philosophy)DelegationJurisdictionGovernorPolitical scienceGeographyOperations researchEngineeringLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Great Lakes Commission (GLC) is the only regional organization whose statutory mandate is to represent the eight Great Lakes states on a variety of environmental and economic issues. It was created in 1955 and was granted Congressional consent in 1968. The Great Lakes Commission is now a binational agency: its members include the eight Great Lakes states—Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin; the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Québec have had associate member status since 1999. The Commission is dedicated to managing the waterbody of the Great Lakes: it promotes the orderly, integrated and comprehensive development, use, and conservation of the water and related natural resources of the Great Lakes Basin and St. Lawrence River. Each jurisdiction appoints a delegation of three to five members comprised of senior agency officials, legislators, or appointees of the governor or premier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater EncyclopediaSame topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207