MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 17744: Impact of Hypertensive Crisis on Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function: Comprehensive Speckle Tracking Strain Analysis vs. Conventional Echocardiography

2011· article· en· W171374701 on OpenAlexaff
Mahboob Alam, Mark Stampehl, Saima A. Shahzad, Sahar Siddiqui, Lily Zhang, Nasser Lakkis, Hisham Dokainish

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineSpeckle tracking echocardiographyDiastoleDiastolic functionVentricular functionSystoleBlood pressureHeart failureEjection fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Echocardiographic strain analysis using speckle tracking is more sensitive than traditional 2-D & Doppler evaluation. The acute impact of hypertensive crisis on LV systolic and diastolic function using echocardiography is not described. Hypothesis: Hypertensive crisis induces acute impairment of LV systolic & diastolic function that may be detected using strain analysis. Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with hypertensive crisis underwent serial echocardiograms including 2D, Doppler & Speckle Tracking strain analyses at baseline & after blood pressure optimization. Results: Mean age of the patients was 53.9 ± 12.8 yrs. Most common presenting symptoms were shortness of breath (70%), chest pain (43.3%), & altered mental status (13.3%). Mean systolic & diastolic blood pressures at baseline were 193.5 ± 25.1mmHg and 106.8 ± 19.8mmHg that reduced to 142.8 ± 20.5mmHg (p<0.001) and 76.7 ± 18.4mmHg (p<0.001) respectively after therapy.Baseline and follow-up echocardiograms showed reduction in left and right atrial volumes at follow-up. There was no change in LV ejection fraction & fractional shortening at follow-up (48.5 ± 18.2 % vs. 46.7 ± 18.3 %; p=0.50 and 28.0 ± 15.2 % vs. 30.8 ± 14.4 %; p=0.22 respectively). Doppler trans-mitral E-wave and A-wave velocities & mitral E/A ratio were similar at baseline and follow-up.There was an increase in mean global longitudinal LV systolic strain (-10.4 ± 4.4 % to -12.1 ± 4.2 %; p=0.011). Peak systolic circumferential strain increased on follow-up from -6.0 ± 3.2 to -11.3 ± 5.4, p=0.03.Mean global early diastolic strain increased from -4.9 ± 2.7 to -9.4 ± 5.0, p=0.05 at follow-up. Conclusions: Our study describes the impact of hypertensive crisis on echocardipgrahic parameters of LV systolic and diastolic function using strain analysis that has never been described before. Global longitudinal & circumferential systolic strain are more sensitive at detecting subtle changes in LV systolic function in the setting of hypertensive crisis when compared to ejection fraction and fractional shortening. Echocardiographic indices of LV diastolic function (E/e', Left atrial volume and mitral DT) as well as early diastolic strain also significantly improve after therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207