Sensitivity to light weakly-coupled new physics at the precision frontier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precision measurements of rare particle physics phenomena (flavor oscillations and decays, electric dipole moments, etc.) are often sensitive to the effects of new physics encoded in higher-dimensional operators with Wilson coefficients given by $\mathrm{C}/({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{\mathrm{NP}}{)}^{n}$, where C is dimensionless, $n\ensuremath{\ge}1$, and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{\mathrm{NP}}$ is an energy scale. Many extensions of the Standard Model predict that ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{\mathrm{NP}}$ should be at the electroweak scale or above, and the search for new short-distance physics is often stated as the primary goal of experiments at the precision frontier. In rather general terms, we investigate the alternative possibility---$\mathrm{C}\ensuremath{\ll}1$, and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{\mathrm{NP}}\ensuremath{\ll}{m}_{W}$---to identify classes of precision measurements sensitive to light new physics (hidden sectors) that do not require an ultraviolet completion with additional states at or above the electroweak scale. We find that hadronic electric dipole moments, lepton number and flavor violation, nonuniversality, as well as lepton $g\ensuremath{-}2$ can be induced at interesting levels by hidden sectors with light degrees of freedom. In contrast, many hadronic flavor- and baryon number-violating observables, and precision probes of charged currents, typically require new physics with ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{\mathrm{NP}}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}{m}_{W}$. Among the leptonic observables, we find that a nonzero electron electric dipole moment near the current level of sensitivity would point to the existence of new physics at or above the electroweak scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".