MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Bird’s Eye View of the Oriental History

2010· article· en· W1714563527 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qiang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuddhismCivilizationHumanitiesEthnologyMeaning (existential)PhilosophyPoliticsOrder (exchange)HistoryPolitical scienceEpistemologyTheologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Similar to the mankind, civilizations also occur and develop by certain life cycle. In the process of rationality growth, the Indian and Chinese civilizations melt the outside experience material continuously with their profoud spriritual potential and gave rise to two great “philosophical breakthrough”, thus renewing the original net of meaning. Just as Upanisad rules that Buddhism concerns how to set soul free, classical statecraft culture also rules that Chinese thinkers pay close attention to political order. With the emergence of their great spiritual masters, the two civilization grew up from the childhood and obtained their adult forms—Buddhism and Confucianism. Mahayana Buddhism as the crystal of the Indian “philosophical breakthrough” spread toward faraway east along the“Silk Road” and collided with the Chinese civilization which also experienced the similar“philosophical breakthrough” , as the result, the latter’s gene was changed forever. Keywords: philosophical break through, cultural gene, Buddhism, Confucianism, Mahayana Buddhism, statecraft culture, Neo-Confucianism Resume Les grandes civilisations, comme le developpement de l’humanite, ont leur propre cycle vital de la naissance au vieillissement. Dans le processus de developpement rationnel, les civilisations indienne et chinoise constituent deux grandes « percees philosophiques » dans l’histoire de la pensee grâce a leur renouvellement constant avec le temps. De meme que Upanisad definit l’attention que le bouddhisme prete a la delivrance de l’âme de l’individu, la culture royale et officielle decide aussi la poursuite de l’ordre politique parfait par les differentes ecoles de pensees de l’epoque pre-Qin. Ces deux grandes civilisations ont reussi a accomplir leur developpement spirituel et atteint l’etat de maturite—le bouddhisme et le confucianisme. Le bouddhisme de grand Cheng hautement philosophique, en tant que la cristallisation du developpement rationnel de la civilisation, a ete diffuse vers l’Est lointain le long de la Route de la Soie et assimile par la civilisation chinoise qui avait connu elle-meme une percee philosophique, et a modifie ainsi a jamais le gene interieur de la civilisation de la Chine. Mots-cles: percee philosophique, gene culturel, bouddhisme, confucianisme, bouddhisme de grand Cheng, culture royale et officielle, philosophie neo-confucianiste des dynasties Song et Ming 摘 要 各大文明也和人類一樣有著發生發育以至衰老的生命週期。在理性發育的過程中印度文明和中國文明以其深刻而豐富的意蘊不斷融化經驗材料,更新其原有的意義之網,從而形成思想史上兩次偉大的“哲學突破”。正如《奧義書》規定了佛學對個人靈魂解脫的關注,王官文化也規定了諸子百家對完美的政治秩序的追求。兩大文明在其偉大的精神導師那裏順利地完成了心智發育,從而獲得了自己的成年形態――佛教與儒教。高度哲理化的大乘佛學作為印度文明理性發育之結晶則沿著“絲綢之路”傳向遙遠的東方,為同樣發生過“哲學突破”的中國文明所消化,從而永遠地改變了後者的內在基因。 關鍵詞:哲學突破;文化基因;佛教;儒教;大乘佛學;王官文化;宋明理學

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207