El Capítulo Local OSGeo para la comunidad hispano-hablante
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ha pasado un ano desde que se iniciaran las actividades del Capitulo Local para la comunidad hispano-hablante de la Fundacion OSGeo (OSGeo Spanish). Se presentara un resumen de las actividades llevadas a cabo durante este ano en la comunidad OSGeo Spanish, el estado de las mismas y las previsiones para el ano 2008. Desde la creacion de la lista de correo a la presentacion de este mismo informe en el FOSS4G2007 en Victoria (Canada), se han iniciado los primeros contactos entre la comunidad hispano-hablante y la comunidad principalmente anglosajona de OSGeo. Desde un punto de vista general, sin adherirse a ningun proyecto en particular, OSGeo Spanish pretende afianzar una comunidad de usuarios y desarrolladores de Software Libre para la Geomatica. De igual modo se presentaran los avances en la realizacion asi como la difusion de materiales didacticos a traves del liderazgo de la iniciativa para la edicion de un Libro de Sistemas de Informacion Geografica con una licencia libre
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".