Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
John Gower: Poems on Contemporary Events edited by David R. Carlson, with a verse translation by A. G. Rigg. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2011. Pp. viii + 419. $150. In the Visio Anglie and the Cronica tripertita, Gower writes in Latin about two of the most serious political events of his lifetime, the Peasants' Revolt of 1381 and the deposition of Richard II in 1399. Although the two poems have been previously made available in scholarly editions of Gower's works, this most recent version by David Carlson, with a verse translation by A. G. Rigg, is welcome for several reasons. By going back to the manuscripts, it offers a newly established text along with an accessible and accurate translation accompanied by critical commentary; by excerpting the two poems (usually transmitted as part of Gower's Vox clamantis), it highlights Gower's famously tare reactions to contemporary events; and by publishing the two together, it invites comparison of Gower's poetic treatments of political events separated by some twenty years and thus of his changing stylistic strategies and ideological allegiances. It makes a certain sense to publish these poems as stand-alone works, given that both the Visio Anglie and the Cronica tripertita are evidently later additions to the Vox clamantis, as Carlson and Rigg explain, which made their way into that text as part of Gower's process of reworking and expanding his oeuvre in the years after 1393, by which point all three of his major works had been written. The most obviously added of the two is the Cronica, which was probably written in early 1400, some twenty years after the rest of the Vox. The Cronica clearly circulated separately, even though it survives as a coda in four of five existing manuscripts of the Vox to which it is connected by means of prose explanations that describe it as the work's natural conclusion. The Visio appears also to have been an addendum to the Vox, although a less well-integrated one, transmitted as its first book. The editing and translating work is fresh, accurate, and useful in making the poems accessible. Since there is no existing stand-alone version of the Visio, Carlson and Rigg use Oxford, Bodleian Library, Digby 138, one of the earliest copies of the Vox as their base text; Oxford, Bodleian Library, Hatton 92, which contains a copy of the Cronica by itself, is their base text for that poem. In both cases, readings from other relevant manuscripts are helpfully included. The verse translations wisely aim to render Gower's Latin into readable English, rather than to reproduce his style, although the meters of the translations depend on those in Gower's originals. The Visio is in unrhymed elegiac couplets, which Rigg renders as unrhymed iambic pentameters. The Cronica is in rhymed hexameters, using the variant known as Leonines, which have a disyllabic rhyme between the caesura and the end of the line; the English translates this into a longer Alexandrine line of twelve-syllabled iambics, with end-rhymes in couplets, thus capturing the general feel of Gower's verse. The result is an elegant, yet readable, set of texts that can be profitably used by those who can read the original Latin and those who cannot. While appreciating the scholarship behind this edition, many readers will no doubt be most interested in what these two poems say about the events of 1381 and 1399. The pressure of current affairs seems to have been what drove Gower to write these two ancillary poems, diverting him from his moralizing on the state of the society around him in the direction of something else, effectively more satiric, as the introduction puts it (8). …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it