MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W171531500

John Gower: Poems on Contemporary Events

2011· article· en· W171531500 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Sponsler

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhilological quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval European Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryLiteraturePoliticsIdeologyPublishingHistoryIambic pentameterPhilosophyClassicsArtLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

John Gower: Poems on Contemporary Events edited by David R. Carlson, with a verse translation by A. G. Rigg. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2011. Pp. viii + 419. $150. In the Visio Anglie and the Cronica tripertita, Gower writes in Latin about two of the most serious political events of his lifetime, the Peasants' Revolt of 1381 and the deposition of Richard II in 1399. Although the two poems have been previously made available in scholarly editions of Gower's works, this most recent version by David Carlson, with a verse translation by A. G. Rigg, is welcome for several reasons. By going back to the manuscripts, it offers a newly established text along with an accessible and accurate translation accompanied by critical commentary; by excerpting the two poems (usually transmitted as part of Gower's Vox clamantis), it highlights Gower's famously tare reactions to contemporary events; and by publishing the two together, it invites comparison of Gower's poetic treatments of political events separated by some twenty years and thus of his changing stylistic strategies and ideological allegiances. It makes a certain sense to publish these poems as stand-alone works, given that both the Visio Anglie and the Cronica tripertita are evidently later additions to the Vox clamantis, as Carlson and Rigg explain, which made their way into that text as part of Gower's process of reworking and expanding his oeuvre in the years after 1393, by which point all three of his major works had been written. The most obviously added of the two is the Cronica, which was probably written in early 1400, some twenty years after the rest of the Vox. The Cronica clearly circulated separately, even though it survives as a coda in four of five existing manuscripts of the Vox to which it is connected by means of prose explanations that describe it as the work's natural conclusion. The Visio appears also to have been an addendum to the Vox, although a less well-integrated one, transmitted as its first book. The editing and translating work is fresh, accurate, and useful in making the poems accessible. Since there is no existing stand-alone version of the Visio, Carlson and Rigg use Oxford, Bodleian Library, Digby 138, one of the earliest copies of the Vox as their base text; Oxford, Bodleian Library, Hatton 92, which contains a copy of the Cronica by itself, is their base text for that poem. In both cases, readings from other relevant manuscripts are helpfully included. The verse translations wisely aim to render Gower's Latin into readable English, rather than to reproduce his style, although the meters of the translations depend on those in Gower's originals. The Visio is in unrhymed elegiac couplets, which Rigg renders as unrhymed iambic pentameters. The Cronica is in rhymed hexameters, using the variant known as Leonines, which have a disyllabic rhyme between the caesura and the end of the line; the English translates this into a longer Alexandrine line of twelve-syllabled iambics, with end-rhymes in couplets, thus capturing the general feel of Gower's verse. The result is an elegant, yet readable, set of texts that can be profitably used by those who can read the original Latin and those who cannot. While appreciating the scholarship behind this edition, many readers will no doubt be most interested in what these two poems say about the events of 1381 and 1399. The pressure of current affairs seems to have been what drove Gower to write these two ancillary poems, diverting him from his moralizing on the state of the society around him in the direction of something else, effectively more satiric, as the introduction puts it (8). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,075

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,005
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0230,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,172
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,066 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhilological quarterlyMême sujetMedieval European Literature and HistoryTravaux en français237 207