Performance analysis of adaptive IIR notch filters based on least mean p-power error criterion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present the steady state analysis of adaptive IIR notch filters based on the least mean p-power error criterion. We consider the cases when the sinusoidal signal is contaminated with white Gaussian noise and p=3, 4. We first derive two difference equations for the convergence of the mean and the mean square error (MSE) of the adaptive filter's notch coefficient, and then give the steady state estimation bias and MSE. Stability conditions on the step size value are also derived. Simulation experiments are presented to confirm the validity of the obtained analytical results. It is shown that the notch coefficient steady state bias of the p-power algorithm for small step size values is independent of the step size value and is equal for p=1, 2, 3 and 4. However, for larger step size values, the p-power algorithm with p=3 provides the best performance in term of the MSE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it