Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract 2,3‐Dihydroxybiphenyl 1,2‐dioxygenase (DHBD) is an Fe 2+ ‐dependent extradiol dioxygenase. DHBD catalyzes the extradiol cleavage of 2,3‐dihydroxybiphenyl (DHB) to 2‐hydroxy‐6‐oxo‐6‐phenylhexa‐2,4‐dienoate (HOPDA) incorporating both atoms of dioxygen into the product HOPDA. DHBDs are found in a range of Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria that aerobically assimilate biphenyl. Amino acid sequences are available for over 50 bacterial extradiol dioxygenases that are evolutionarily related to DHBDs (i.e. type I enzymes); all are involved in the degradation of aromatic compounds. The type I bacterial enzymes may have large (∼33 kDa) or small (∼21 kDa) monomers. DHBD catalyzes the third reaction of the upper bph pathway, which catabolizes biphenyl to benzoate and 2‐hydroxypentadienoate. This pathway also transforms some polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). DHBDs can be best expressed heterologously in pseudomonads like Burkholderia sp. strain LB400 or Pseudomonas sp. strain KKS102. Mössbauer and EPR spectroscopies demonstrated the presence of high spin Fe 2+ in purified active preparations of Pseudomonas putida mt‐2 (C23O). High‐resolution crystal structures of the active ferrous form of DHBD from Burkholderia sp. strain LB400 and Pseudomonas sp. strain KKS102 were determined. These octameric DHBDs have 422 point group symmetry. The monomer has an α + ß fold that may be subdivided into superimposable barrel‐like N‐ and C‐terminal half‐molecules. The active site Fe and the substrate binding sites are located in the cavity of the C‐terminal half. The ferrous Fe is bound by five ligands in square pyramidal geometry. The axial ligand is a conserved histidine, and the basal ligands are a second conserved histidine, a conserved monodentate glutamic acid, and two water molecules. X‐ray structures of DHBD in complex with DHB and 3‐methyl catechol are known for both the ferric and ferrous forms. Spectroscopic, mechanistic, and X‐ray structural studies were used to elaborate a plausible reaction mechanism for DHBDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.119 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".