MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1718559817

El contrato de seguro en el transporte aeronáutico a la luz del convenio de montreal de 1999

2013· article· es· W1718559817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurídicas CUC · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative International Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente articulo se refiere al estudio del Contrato de Seguro Aeronautico y su tratamiento legal actual a nivel internacional, teniendo en cuenta la gran cantidad de riesgos que la actividad aeronautica implica, los diversos intereses juridicamente tutelados que intervienen, la proteccion que por tradicion se ha dado a las companias aereas a fin de evitar que ante un siniestro perezcan economicamente, se hizo casi desde sus inicios, que la actividad fuera pionera en la proteccion de sus pasajeros con la constitucion de polizas de responsabilidad civil. ?Cuando intervienen las companias aseguradoras en caso de un siniestro? ?Cual es su responsabilidad indemnizatoria? ?Donde deben indemnizar a las victimas y sus causahabientes? El objetivo del presente articulo es dar a conocer cuando juegan algun papel importante los reaseguros y pools de aseguradores, el ambito de aplicacion legal y el analisis de la normativa en esta materia y sus aspectos practicos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it