Executable attribute grammars for modular and efficient natural language processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Language-processors that are constructed using top-down recursive-descent with backtracking parsing are highly modular, and are easy to implement and maintain. However, a widely-held inaccurate view is that top-down processors are inherently exponential for ambiguous grammars and cannot accommodate left-recursive syntax rules. It has been known that exponential time and space complexities can be avoided by memoization and compact graph-structured representation, and that left- recursive productions can be accommodated through a variety of techniques. However, until now, memoization, compact representation, and techniques for handling left-recursion have either been presented independently, or else attempts at their integration have compromised modularity and correctness of the resulting parses. Specifying syntax and semantics to describe formal languages using denotational notation of attribute grammars (AGs) has been widely practiced. However, very little work has shown the usefulness of declarative AGs for constructing computational models of natural language. Previous top-down approaches fall short in accommodating ambiguous and general CFGs with arbitrary semantics in one pass as executable specifications. Existing approaches lack in providing a declarative syntax-semantics interface that can take full advantages of dependencies between attributes of syntactic constituents to model linguistically-motivated cases. This thesis solves these shortcomings by proposing a new modular top-down syntactic and semantic analysis system, which is efficient and accommodates all forms of CFGs. Moreover, this system provides notation to declaratively specify semantics by establishing arbitrary dependencies between attributes of syntactic categories to perform linguistically-motivated tasks such as: building directly-executable natural-language query processors, computing meanings of sentences using compositional semantics, performing contextual disambiguation tasks, modelling restrictive classes of languages etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".