MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1718715070 · doi:10.7202/701835ar

Une « boîte noire » à manipuler soigneusement : L’analyse des coûts et des bénéfices sociaux de l’entreprise multinationale

2005· article· en· W1718715070 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Bernard Bonin

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance of paymentsMultinational corporationCurrencyBalance (ability)SpeculationPaymentBusinessTransfer pricingCapital (architecture)EconomicsInternational economicsWelfare economicsMonetary economicsGeographyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper assumes that the analysis of the social costs and benefits of the MNE is not only possible but also necessary. This kind of analysis is not easy because there are different rival theoretical models, because of the oligopoliste market structures that characterize multinational industries, and because the often clashing interest of home and host countries. However the author is able to identify the main costs and benefits for each group of countries. The home countries are often able to export products and factors, and to import steady flows of cheap raw materials and intermediate goods thanks to MNE. However they risk the loss of taxes, jobs and capital; besides they can suffer from MNE speculation against their own currency and balance of payments imbalances. Host countries show positive gains in terms of economic development, and eventual access to foreign markets. However they can loose taxes, suffer the extra-territorial implementation of home countries' laws and policies as well as transfer-pricing and balance-of-payments desequilibra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationalesSame topicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207