MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1718812129

Construction and analysis of the natural population life table for continuous generation of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L.

2000· article· en· W1718812129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the South China Agricultural University · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Biological Studies
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlutellaDiamondback mothPupaPopulationBiologydBmParasitoidNatural population growthPlutellidaeLarvaToxicologyHorticultureAgronomyBotanyDemographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the data of systematic survey in the field and observation in the laboratory, the natural population life tables of continuous two generations of the diamondback moth (DBM) , Plutella xylostella L., were constructed on one cropping of flowering Chinese cabbage in Shenzheng, Guandong Province. The results showed that the indices of population trend of two continuous generations of DBM were 11. 9 and 24. 4, respectively in spring and autumn. Parasitoids played a determinant role in the control of natural population of DBM. In spring, the important factor influencing the natural population of DBM was the larval-pupae parasitoid, Oomyzus sokolowsakii (Kurdjumov), which exclusive index of population control (EIPC) reached 8. 28. While the EIPC of Cotesia plutellae Kurdjumov was 4. 85. In autumn, C. plutellae was the secondly important factor influencing the natural population of DBM, which EIPC was 3. 67. The low EIPC (1 .2) of O. sokolowsakii caused a high population increase of DBM in autumn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it