Investigating the role of the invariant carboxylate residues E552 and E1197 in the catalytic activity of Abcb1a (mouse Mdr3)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The invariant carboxylate residue which follows the Walker B motif (hyd(4)DE/D) in the nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) of ATP-binding cassette transporters is thought to be involved in the hydrolysis of the gamma-phosphate of MgATP, either by activating the attacking water molecule or by promoting substrate-assisted catalysis. In Abcb1a, this invariant carboxylate residue corresponds to E552 in NBD1 and E1197 in NBD2. To further characterize the role of these residues in catalysis, we created in Abcb1a the single-site mutants E552D, N and A in NBD1, and E1197D, N and A in NBD2, as well as the double-mutant E552Q/E1197Q. In addition, we created mutants in which the Walker A K --> R mutation known to abolish ATPase activity was introduced in the non-mutant NBD of E552Q and E1197Q. ATPase activity, binding affinity and trapping properties were tested for each Abcb1a variant. The results suggest that the length of the invariant carboxylate residue is important for the catalytic activity, whereas the charge of the side chain is critical for full turnover to occur. Moreover, in the double-mutants where the K --> R mutation is introduced in the 'wild-type' NBD of the E --> Q mutants, single-site turnover is observed, especially when NBD2 can undergo gamma-P(i) cleavage. The results further support the idea that the NBDs are not symmetric and suggest that the invariant carboxylates are involved both in NBD-NBD communication and transition-state formation through orientation of the linchpin residue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".