Handrelaterade aktivitetsbegränsningar och greppstyrka hos kvinnor över 75 år som upplever nedsatt handfunktion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forskning har visat att handfunktion försämras med stigande ålder och begränsar äldre människors aktiviteter i det dagliga livet. Syftet med studien var att ta reda på i vilka dagliga aktiviteter äldre kvinnor upplever aktivitetsbegränsningar på grund av upplevd nedsatt handfunktion. Studien har en tvärsnittsdesign med kvantitativ ansats där Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Jamar Dynamometer och Pinch Gauge använts som bedömningsinstrument. Arton äldre kvinnor med en medianålder på 78 år (range 75-99) deltog i undersökningen. Aktivitetsbegränsningarna var bland annat att öppna burk/flaska/mjölkpaket, lyfta stekpanna, dammsuga, tvätta ryggen, knäppa knappar, att tappa saker samt att stryka kläder. Greppstyrkan i helhandsgreppet och fingertoppsgreppet var lägre i jämförelse med normalvärden för dominanta handen hos friska kvinnor över 75 år.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".