MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1719801422 · doi:10.4000/communication.2637

Ruth WODAK, Barbara JOHNSTONE et Paul KERSWILL (dir.) (2010), The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics

2012· article· en· W1719801422 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Delphine Choffat

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociolinguisticsSAGELinguisticsSociologyArtPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publier un nouvel ouvrage encyclopédique sur la sociolinguistique pourrait de prime abord relever de la gageure, comme le soulignent Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone et Paul Kerswill. En effet, un certain nombre d’ouvrages de qualité existent déjà sur le marché. On peut par exemple évoquer Florian Coulmas (1998) ou encore Ulrich Ammon et al. (2004-2006). D’emblée, nous pouvons dire que le défi évoqué par les éditeurs au début de l’ouvrage est relevé. Le lecteur trouvera dans les six sections con...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicLinguistic Variation and MorphologyFrench-language works237,207