Evolution of thermal and mechanical properties of mine tailings and fly ash mixtures during curing period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fly ash is often used as a binder for modifying the properties of geomaterials, such as organic and expansive soils, sludge from water treatment, dredged sediments, mine tailings, etc. Changes in thermal and mechanical properties of compacted mixtures of mine tailings and fly ash are studied over a curing period of 120 h. The study includes the measurement of thermal conductivity, temperature, unconfined compressive strength, and elastic modulus. Effects of the amount of fly ash added to mine tailings, molding water content, and compaction energy on these properties are investigated. Pore-size distribution and surface texture are analyzed to characterize the microstructures of fly ash treated–mine tailings. Relationships between the thermal conductivity and properties that capture packing and mechanical characteristics of mine tailings and fly ash mixtures are established. These observations provide enhanced understanding of thermal, mechanical, and structural properties of fly ash–treated mine tailings, which is associated with the hydration process at the early stage of the mixtures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".