Essais moraux, politiques et littéraires, Première partie (review)
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Review of an edition of Hume's essays; philosophy book review.
This is explicitly a review and therefore contextual material rather than an analytic study.
Book review of Hume essays; humanities commentary, not research practice.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Hume studies
- Topic
- Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Field
- Arts and Humanities
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Philosophy
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no