MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1722050708 · doi:10.1109/plans.2002.998903

Space weather predictions service for safety-critical GPS applications

2003· article· en· W1722050708 on OpenAlexaff
S. Skone, Mahmoud ElGizawy, Shirshak Shrestha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemSpace weatherAviationMeteorologySatelliteComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingGeographyAerospace engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhanced ionospheric effects may exist during space weather events, leading to degradations in GPS performance and positioning accuracies. This issue is a concern for reliable operation of safety-critical GPS systems, such as marine DGPS services or Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) for aviation applications. These storm-related effects tend to peak in the years following solar maximum, and will continue to be a concern for GPS applications over the next few years (2002-2003). In order to provide timely predictions of space weather events, we have recently investigated an ionospheric warning and alert system for GPS applications. Predictive capabilities are based on space weather parameters provided by the United States Space Environment Center at NOAA. The impact of ionospheric activity on GPS performance has been quantified using several years of GPS data from the North American sector, with a focus on marine and aviation applications. We have established strong correlations between GPS performance and various ionospheric phenomena, and we are able to provide space weather predictions for GPS users up to six hours in advance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1700.131

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→