MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A child with Muscle‐Eye‐Brain disease

2001· article· en· W1722928415 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kristina Teär Fahnehjelm, Jan Ygge, Mona‐Lisa Engman, Mikael Mosskin, Pirkko Santavuori, Gunilla Malm

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica Scandinavica · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsSamfundet Folkhälsan
KeywordsMedicinePachygyriaMuscular dystrophyDiseaseCongenital muscular dystrophyOphthalmologyPediatricsPathologyLissencephalyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To describe a child with Muscle-Eye-Brain disease (MEB), one of three types of congenital muscular dystrophy associated with ocular abnormalities. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: The child showed severe visual impairment due to progressive myopia and retinal degeneration, a pachygyria-type of migration disorder of the brain with a nodular cortical surface, i.e. cobblestone cortex, as well as muscular weakness and severe mental retardation. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmological assessments are important to help to diagnose and follow children with congenital muscular dystrophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Ophthalmologica ScandinavicaSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207