MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Germ Oils from Different Sources

2020· other· en· W1725147780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBailey's Industrial Oil and Fat Products · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicEdible Oils Quality and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermBranRefining (metallurgy)Wheat germEdible oilBiotechnologyFood scienceEnvironmental scienceChemistryBiologyRaw materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plant germ oils of high nutritional quality may be procured from cereal grains. Germ oil processing presents a challenge because of the high content of biologically active heat‐labile components. Physical refining methods improve retention of these compounds in the final product. Currently, plant seed germ oils, except corn germ oil, are produced for specialty markets in the United States. However, increasing consumer demand for healthy food products may change the market trends in the future. Several reviews have been published on wheat, corn, and rice bran oils over the years. Therefore, this article, with sufficient background information, will emphasize the latest literature on composition, nutritional characteristics, and processing methods of plant germ oils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it